Comments on: Lincoln Fry loses

By: Kenny Ferguson

Kenny Ferguson — Sat, 19 Feb 2005 05:29:00 +0000

Yeah, it had those problems too, Scoob. Interesting idea with the CNN breaking news ads, btw. It sounds pretty perverted to us former CNNers around here, so let’s hope this is not the direction things are headed in journalism.

By: little snoobie

little snoobie — Sat, 19 Feb 2005 04:34:00 +0000

So what you guys are saying is that the blog is what think is a failure. I agree that a week before the TV commercials is not long enough of a time for the news to get around. That’s definitely not long enough to get people talking around the water cooler. What it really needed is to get places like CNN to scroll it during the reports. And perhaps if it was Elvis or someone less historical it could have been more interesting. Thanks for those links to the bathroom attendant and the asian, female ronald. Pretty funny stuff.

By: Kenny Ferguson

Kenny Ferguson — Sat, 19 Feb 2005 02:24:00 +0000

And another great McDonald’s site. Too brilliant to be dreamed up by a traditional agency, and too subversive to ever be approved.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:48:00 +0000

Here’s another interesting McDonald’s story that could have been (or perhaps is) an interesting viral marketing tactic.

Raj

By: Mason Poe

Mason Poe — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:09:00 +0000

The funny thing is this has caused way more of a stir than the lincon fry ever could have hoped.

By: Stefan Kjartansson

Stefan Kjartansson — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:03:00 +0000

Now, here’s how it really, really should be done…

By: Mason Poe

Mason Poe — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:25:00 +0000

The Mcdonalds fry campaign was a great idea and was so sooo close to being an amazing slam dunk of a promotion. So close in-fact that what I think what we have here is simply the ‘Aaaawwww’ grown from the industry home crowd as the shot falls like a missed lay-up into an oblivion of yesterdays news.

In viral marketing (what McDonalds was obviously shooting for here) you can’t woo the consumer by jumping right to the action; if you do it cheapens the entire experience to something as forgettable as a 30 second super bowl one night stand. Something like this needs weeks if not months of build up. Something for people to talk about over lunch. Something to email to friends to post to a blog.

At the end of the day marketing is all about creating a dialogue with the consumer. The McDonald’s campaign went astray because they didn’t give anyone the chance to say anything; it was over before anyone was able to send the first email or post the first link to a blog. No mystery, no suspense just the debut on another super bowl and a creative industry shaking their head and wondering what happened and thinking about what could have been.

– Mason Poe

By: little snoobie

little snoobie — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 04:26:00 +0000

I agree with with anonymous. It WAS a funny idea. Kenny, perhaps your humor more lies with talking chimps and farting horses. It’s nice to see a commercial that has subtlety and sophistication. I checked online and at least 3 New York newspapers thought it was funny, ESPN, and some ad reviewer from AD Age, Bob Garfield as well. But perhaps, you wrote the book on funny. I do agree with Stefan. The blog seemed poorly written and unconvincing. But the web commercial was up to Christopher Guest quality.

By: Stefan Kjartansson

Stefan Kjartansson — Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:42:00 +0000

To Anonymous’ point, it is easier to criticize than create and I suspect there are corporate politics and logistics behind the watered down final product.

Our strong negative reaction to this project probably has more to do with the fact that we can almost smell how great this could have been - at least kept viral for a little bit longer, before resolving. Once the processed Flash wrapper unveils the brand, the concept, the sarcasm is deflated.

By: Kenny Ferguson

Kenny Ferguson — Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:11:00 +0000

No, really, Anonymous. We get the joke. It was just a bad one.