<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movable Type vs. Wordpress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armchairmedia.com/2007/10/12/movable-type-vs-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armchairmedia.com/2007/10/12/movable-type-vs-wordpress/</link>
	<description>Everything is Interactive</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ola</title>
		<link>http://armchairmedia.com/2007/10/12/movable-type-vs-wordpress/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Ola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairmedia.com/2007/10/12/movable-type-vs-wordpress/#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Wow, i remember when i also started with cms systems and using Movable Type. However, i was one of those who didn't make the switch until a year or two after everyone. lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, i remember when i also started with cms systems and using Movable Type. However, i was one of those who didn&#8217;t make the switch until a year or two after everyone. lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg T</title>
		<link>http://armchairmedia.com/2007/10/12/movable-type-vs-wordpress/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairmedia.com/2007/10/12/movable-type-vs-wordpress/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>I think it will take more than them opening back up to change the tide.  I also switched to Wordpress some time ago and they have continued to advance the platform with frequency.  While the management interface could be better so can most and I don't find myself frustrated using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will take more than them opening back up to change the tide.  I also switched to Wordpress some time ago and they have continued to advance the platform with frequency.  While the management interface could be better so can most and I don&#8217;t find myself frustrated using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany</title>
		<link>http://armchairmedia.com/2007/10/12/movable-type-vs-wordpress/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairmedia.com/2007/10/12/movable-type-vs-wordpress/#comment-407</guid>
		<description>MT 4 might be better now, but I remember when it was hard to install, hard to configure, had a confusing (IMO) interface, ran slow as molasses, and *then* changed its licensing structure. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;At the time WordPress was everything MT wasn't and had better spam protection to boot. People flocked.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm glad that SixApart has (or plans to) open source MT -- having that freedom to modify and innovate on a platform is critical.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I have no plans to switch my own blog, but MT might work for future projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MT 4 might be better now, but I remember when it was hard to install, hard to configure, had a confusing (IMO) interface, ran slow as molasses, and *then* changed its licensing structure. </p>
<p>At the time WordPress was everything MT wasn&#8217;t and had better spam protection to boot. People flocked.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that SixApart has (or plans to) open source MT &#8212; having that freedom to modify and innovate on a platform is critical.</p>
<p>I have no plans to switch my own blog, but MT might work for future projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
