<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Miscellany: a nominalist&#8217;s essence of the web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://armchairmedia.com/2007/11/12/miscellany-nominalists-essence-of-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://armchairmedia.com/2007/11/12/miscellany-nominalists-essence-of-web/</link>
	<description>Everything is Interactive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joho</title>
		<link>http://armchairmedia.com/2007/11/12/miscellany-nominalists-essence-of-web/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>joho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armchairmedia.com/2007/11/12/the-miscellany-a-nominalists-essence-of-the-web/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Since I agree with just about everything you say (with the &quot;just about&quot; intended merely to give me some wiggle room if necessary), it must be that I read my book differently than you do :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I certainly agree that we need local forms of organization, and designers need to make good decisions, even while enabling users to sort and order in the particular ways they want to.  And -- while I open and close asking why the miscellaneous never stays that way -- I apparently pushed so hard on what I thought would be novel to my readers (the multifariousness of order), I obscured the very important points you make so clearly. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, yes. And thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I agree with just about everything you say (with the &#8220;just about&#8221; intended merely to give me some wiggle room if necessary), it must be that I read my book differently than you do :)</p>
<p>I certainly agree that we need local forms of organization, and designers need to make good decisions, even while enabling users to sort and order in the particular ways they want to.  And &#8212; while I open and close asking why the miscellaneous never stays that way &#8212; I apparently pushed so hard on what I thought would be novel to my readers (the multifariousness of order), I obscured the very important points you make so clearly. </p>
<p>So, yes. And thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
